11.05.2006

populism and peace

George McGovern, South Dakota populist Democrat.

When he was ten, Hootenanny's Doug Teever met George McGovern. It was after the failed Presidential election, but George was still out stumping for the right and the good. It wouldn't be long before we discovered that the Republicans had stolen (almost literally) the election through a process of intimidation and crime, including burglary of the Democratic HQ at the Watergate in DC. Much of that activity, including infiltration of peaceful student organizations, is back in fashion among the religious right dominated Republicans of today.

We're not saying Republicans aren't good folk. They are. Nearly all of them. But too many are misguided and mislead. It's like watching a car wreck, we want to look away but we can't. We don't want to see the damage and the carnage but then again we do.

We have to ask the question - what do they have against peace? And, when they throw our boys in harm's way, why the lack of real support? Like equipment and machinery and troop levels, not platitudes about staying the course, or that we're actually "winning" when a situation goes from critical to chaos. Take a look at the linked editorial to your right. It's to be published in The Army, Air Force and Marine Times. It regards Donald Rumsfeld, your Secretary of Defense. A good, thought provoking read. Or maybe just a reiteration of the obvious.

VOTE!

Hootenanny welcomes your comments. If you don't like what we're saying, let us know. We will publish your comments.

And, almost forgot. Get out and vote on Tuesday and think about it, if you had a choice similar to '72s Nixon vs. McGovern, how would you vote today?

2 comments:

  1. I'd still vote for Nixon. :-)

    Of course, I didn't vote for Nixon to begin with - I was three years old in '72.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I'm still am happy that Gore / Kerry didn't become president. It would be nice to have someone capable and inspiring in 2008 at least running. LB

    ReplyDelete